| PENSION CASE STUDIES |
SIPPS/SSAS CASE STUDIES |
INVESTMENTS CASE STUDIES |
PROTECTION CASE STUDIES |
TAXATION CASE STUDIES |
MORTGAGES CASE STUDIES |
Case Studies
Case Study 2 - SSAS Corporation Tax Planning
This case study uses an idea perfectly suited to a company director who is close to retirement but has not made serious pension provision. It achieves the following :
Our aim was to maintain a steady income for the director and to start to fund for a pension, in a scheme which will hold assets for use by the business.
Income planning
The director's salary was reduced to £4,940, which incurs no tax. The company paid £200,000 into a Small Self-Administered Scheme (SSAS). The SSAS trustees immediately provided the director with a 25% tax-free lump sum (pension commencement lump sum) , bringing income for the year back to £54,940
Pension planning
The contribution was paid into a SSAS and after the immediate payment of 25% of the fund to the director, the remaining £150,000 iwas retained in the fund to provide pension benefits in the future.
Funds within the pension scheme can be used to invest in the company. A loan of 50% of the net value of the scheme's assets was then made to the business.
The figures look good. The level of the director's pay was maintained and the pension scheme has funds valued at £150,000 but how was the company's finance affected?
Business financial planning
If the business continues to amass profits then the director's salary, employer's national insurance and corporation tax will reduce the funds in the company to £72,975.
By making the pension contribution and reorganising salary, the company's retained profit was reduced to £2,960. There was no corporation tax or national insurance to pay and the funds available to the company for investment were increased by £4,985.
Conclusion
By investing in a SSAS:
Technical Notes
The overall maximum loan to the principal or any participating employer is 50% of the net assets of the scheme, valued at the date of the loan, subject to:
Schemes that breach the investment rules, make payments to members, or pass assets to members or connected parties outside of the new rules, will be subject to a tax charge or penalties or both.
We believe the above case study is not caught by the legislation under the heading "Recycling of Lump Sums". It is important that advice is sought and obtained on the specific circumstances before embarking on any tax planning concerning the use of pensions.
The information contained in this document is based on Avidity Wealth Management Ltd. understanding of current pensions law and taxation.
Case Study 2 - SSAS Corporation Tax Planning
This case study uses an idea perfectly suited to a company director who is close to retirement but has not made serious pension provision. It achieves the following :
- Increase the value extracted from a company's profits.
- Reduce a company's corporation tax bill.
- Increase the funds available for company investment.
- Generate a pension scheme valued at more than twice its cost to the company.
| Gross annual salary | £ 83,000 |
|---|---|
| Less tax | £ 23,826 |
| Less national insurance | £ 4,234 |
| Net income | £ 54,940 |
Our aim was to maintain a steady income for the director and to start to fund for a pension, in a scheme which will hold assets for use by the business.
Income planning
The director's salary was reduced to £4,940, which incurs no tax. The company paid £200,000 into a Small Self-Administered Scheme (SSAS). The SSAS trustees immediately provided the director with a 25% tax-free lump sum (pension commencement lump sum) , bringing income for the year back to £54,940
| Salary/Scheme Benefits | |
|---|---|
| Annual | |
| Gross salary | £ 4,940 |
| Tax-free lump sum benefit | £ 50,000 |
| Less tax | £ 0 |
| Less national insurance | £ 0 |
| Net salary | £ 54,940 |
Pension planning
The contribution was paid into a SSAS and after the immediate payment of 25% of the fund to the director, the remaining £150,000 iwas retained in the fund to provide pension benefits in the future.
Funds within the pension scheme can be used to invest in the company. A loan of 50% of the net value of the scheme's assets was then made to the business.
| Contribution | £ 200,000 |
|---|---|
| Tax-free cash paid | £ 50,000 |
| Pension fund | £ 150,000 |
| Scheme loan to company | £ 75,000 |
The figures look good. The level of the director's pay was maintained and the pension scheme has funds valued at £150,000 but how was the company's finance affected?
Business financial planning
If the business continues to amass profits then the director's salary, employer's national insurance and corporation tax will reduce the funds in the company to £72,975.
By making the pension contribution and reorganising salary, the company's retained profit was reduced to £2,960. There was no corporation tax or national insurance to pay and the funds available to the company for investment were increased by £4,985.
| Not using a SSAS | Using a SSAS | |
| Pension contributions | N/A | £ 200,000 |
| Profit | £210,000 | £ 10,000 |
| Corporation tax | £ 44,100 | £ 2,100 |
| Salary | £ 83,000 | £ 4,940 |
| National insurance | £ 9,925 | £ 0 |
| Retained profit | £ 72,975 | £ 2,960 |
| SSAS loan to company | N/A | £ 75,000 |
| Funds available for company investment | £ 72,975 | £ 77,960 |
Conclusion
By investing in a SSAS:
- the company had £2,100 corporation tax to pay and no national insurance liability in respect of the director, a saving of £51,925;
- the level of the director's income was maintained at £54,940 p.a.;
- the director paid no income tax or national insurance contributions, saving £28,060;
- a pension fund of £150,000 was created;
- the company's profit was reduced by £67,915 but this was also the net cost of the £150,000 pension fund;
- the funds available to the company for investment were increased by £4,985 to £77,960.
Technical Notes
The overall maximum loan to the principal or any participating employer is 50% of the net assets of the scheme, valued at the date of the loan, subject to:
- secured with a first charge on assets of adequate value;
- maximum term of five years;
- minimum interest rate of 1% above the average base lending rate of the 6 leading high street banks;
- repayment of capital and interest in equal instalments over the period of the loan;
- one missed annual payment may be rolled over once.
Schemes that breach the investment rules, make payments to members, or pass assets to members or connected parties outside of the new rules, will be subject to a tax charge or penalties or both.
We believe the above case study is not caught by the legislation under the heading "Recycling of Lump Sums". It is important that advice is sought and obtained on the specific circumstances before embarking on any tax planning concerning the use of pensions.
The information contained in this document is based on Avidity Wealth Management Ltd. understanding of current pensions law and taxation.